In August 2010, the Supreme Court directed the HRD Ministry to respond to petitions challenging the Right to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. Minority-run unaided schools argued that the Act infringed upon their fundamental rights to manage institutions independently.
The Court’s consideration of this issue reflected the delicate balance between expanding universal education and protecting minority rights.
Highlights:
Challenge raised by minority institutions.
Concern over autonomy under the RTE Act.
Judicial scrutiny of legislative design.
The case continues to serve as a reference point in the dialogue between inclusivity and autonomy.
